After publication, the principles & guidelines were commented on by Eva Rieter and Rosa Möhrlein in a blog on Völkerrechtsblog in July 2021: The Nijmegen Principles and Guidelines on Interim Measures: Maintaining and Enhancing the Protective Potential of Interim Measures in Human Rights Cases.
Follow up by international adjudicators:
The Nijmegen Principles and Guidelines on Interium Measures have been drafted as a practical guide for international adjudicators. The NPGIM have been mentioned in the following decisions of the Human Rights Committee:
- F.F.J.H. vs. Argentina, 8 July 2021 (inadm), dissent Tigroudja, para. 7 (see here).
- T.T. vs. Ukraine, 24 March 2022 (inadm), dissent Tigroudja, para. 6 (see here).
- Mikhalenya vs. Belarus 3105/2018, 21 July 2021, concurring opinion Achour and Tigroudja, paras. 3 and 5 (see here).